Thanks for the reply.

I did come to the conclusion that the grid must be tied to data.  The idea of adding "grid" axes is working well for me except I still seem to have an issue of when I make the minor grid visible it shows up in the the same location as my major grid.  Not sure why.

For now I have turned the minor grid off but will be revisiting this in the future.

Thanks again,

Lou

Hi Lou,

The categorical scale does not regard minor ticks/grid properties as by design it is used to display only discrete (categorical) data. If you post a screenshot of the chart you want to accomplish perhaps we can recommend something else instead - there are lots of options - like using a hierarchical scale to show the grid and then a custom wall decorator to display grid lines etc. , however some visual reference will be helpful to comment on the best approach...

Hi All,

I am trying to place a grid on a simple xy chart that stays the same no matter what the scale does because the labels are not visible, just need a visual reference.

After trying various things I decided to make secondary axes for displaying the grid.

I used CustomStep mode and set the range to view the grid as needed to place them like I wanted. 

Where I am currently running into an issue is if I make the minor grid visible, the lines show up at the same location as the major grid lines.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Lou